Diamond Rarity
wheel / two-color grade · dominant Brown

Pinkish brown

Group share
17%
Pink–brown combinations
Exact count
Not disclosed
GIA publishes group shares, not per-grade counts
Median USD per carat
—
no included sale · 1 qualified
Rarity-adjusted value
insufficient data
two-color grades have no published population
auction sales by intensity0 sales
  1. Fancy Deep—
  2. Fancy Vivid—
  3. Fancy Intense—
  4. Fancy—
  5. Fancy Light—
price by intensity
IntensityIncluded nMedian $/ctMean $/ctLow – highSince 2020QualifiedStudy stonesShare of cohort
Fancy Light————————
Fancy————————
Fancy Intense————————
Fancy Vivid————————
Fancy Deep————————
methodologyshow
read before interpreting

Brownish pink through pinkish brown; no exact directional split or total count disclosed.

argyle context

No separate Argyle count established.

related grades
auction sales0 included · 1 qualified
IDIntensityLot / stoneCaratsClaritySaleRealisedUSD / ctStatusSources
A207Light
A Colored Diamond, Diamond, and White and Rose Gold Ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. Natural color origin not explicitly repeated in the accessible catalog; retained as a qualified catalog observation, not a verified natural-color sample.
2.02 ctSI2
Phillips
New York · 6 Dec 2021
USD 27,720
$27,720 · USD as reported
$13.7kQualifiedlot
supply evidence
this exact grade
IDCohortIntensity binStonesSharePeriod · scopeLimitsSource
S123Pinkish brownIndividual intensity bins——Reviewed GIA papers, 2002–2025
Evidence gap for exact grade

An all-intensity hue count or pooled-family distribution does not disclose this exact hue’s distribution. Blank numeric cells mean unavailable, not zero.

See GIA Evidence hue cohorts
evidence
R35
G2
Pink–brown combinations17% of >90,000Exact count not stated
>90,000 pink/purple/red/brown submissions · 2008-01 through 2016-12

Brownish pink through pinkish brown; no exact directional split or total count disclosed.