Diamond Rarity
wheel / two-color grade · dominant Pink

Brownish pink

Group share
17%
Pink–brown combinations
Exact count
Not disclosed
GIA publishes group shares, not per-grade counts
Median USD per carat
—
no auction sale
Rarity-adjusted value
insufficient data
two-color grades have no published population
auction sales by intensity0 sales
  1. Fancy Deep3% of cohort—
  2. Fancy Vivid0% of cohort—
  3. Fancy Intense0% of cohort—
  4. Fancy97% of cohort—
  5. Fancy Light—
price by intensity
IntensityIncluded nMedian $/ctMean $/ctLow – highSince 2020QualifiedStudy stonesShare of cohort
Fancy Light————————
Fancy——————6497%
Fancy Intense——————00.00%
Fancy Vivid——————00.00%
Fancy Deep——————23%
methodologyshow
read before interpreting

Brownish pink through pinkish brown; no exact directional split or total count disclosed.

argyle context

No separate Argyle count established.

related grades
auction sales0 included · 0 qualified

No auction sale in this dataset.

supply evidence
this exact grade
IDCohortIntensity binStonesSharePeriod · scopeLimitsSource
S017Brownish pinkFancy6497%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S018Brownish pinkFancy Intense00.00%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S020Brownish pinkFancy Vivid00.00%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S019Brownish pinkFancy Deep23%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
related pooled cohorts · cannot be assigned to this grade
IDCohortIntensity binStonesSharePeriod · scopeLimitsSource
S025Pink-dominant family combinedFaint1148%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S026Pink-dominant family combinedVery Light785%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S027Pink-dominant family combinedLight17011%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S028Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Light15610%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S029Pink-dominant family combinedFancy48833%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S055Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy—5%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S030Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Intense28219%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S056Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Intense—46%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S032Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Vivid554%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S058Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Vivid—17%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S031Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Deep14710%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S057Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Deep—32%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
evidence
R35
G2
Pink–brown combinations17% of >90,000Exact count not stated
>90,000 pink/purple/red/brown submissions · 2008-01 through 2016-12

Brownish pink through pinkish brown; no exact directional split or total count disclosed.